Stablecoins made settlement simpler. Gas made operations messier.

GasTanker exists because stablecoin operations still depend on native network assets that payment and treasury teams don't want to manage by hand.

The idea

A company can hold millions in USDC and still fail a payment because the sending wallet is a few dollars short of gas.

That's a tiny balance with an outsized operational impact.

And fixing it at scale runs into a second problem: exchanges want every withdrawal destination approved in advance, while operational wallets keep multiplying.

GasTanker turns both into infrastructure:

  1. monitor
  2. plan
  3. fund through a relay you allowlist once
  4. verify
  5. reconcile

We would rather ship less, and ship it safely.

GasTanker launched as monitoring only. Money movement arrives in stages: exchange connections GasTanker only reads, then human-approved funding, then narrowly bounded automation. Each stage ships only after its security and operational checks pass.

  1. 01 · Live

    Monitoring

    Base wallets, policies, alerts, audit

  2. 02 · Live

    Exchange preview

    Funding preview, dry-run plans

  3. 03 · Coming soon

    Human-approved funding

    Relay, withdrawal, forward, reconcile

  4. 04 · Planned

    Bounded automation

    Narrow, low-risk top-ups without approval

Where we're going

Gas is the wedge. Transaction readiness is the product. Liquidity and sponsorship are the platform.

You shouldn't have to care about that evolution. GasTanker should simply get more capable.

  1. keep my wallets funded
  2. keep my transactions executable
  3. keep my on-chain operations liquid